Bearings
This topic seems to have most geek skaters in a tizz. All seem to have
a different opinion of which bearings and lubrication make them go faster.
Inline skates use rolling element radial ball bearings. The standard
size is the “608” (common in vacuum cleaner motors) which
is 8mm inner diameter, 22mm outer diameter by 7mm wide and are of a
steel (typically 52100) construction. There are other sizes available
like the “688” mini, but the 608 is the standard. When shopping
for these bearings, the marketing “value proposition” usually
centres around its ABEC rating. We are lead to believe that the higher
the ABEC rating the better and faster it is.
The ABEC, annular bearing engineering committee, standards control
the manufacturing tolerance of the bearing. The higher the ABEC rating
the tighter the tolerance. For example, a 608 ABEC 1 bearing has an
outer diameter tolerance of .0000 inches to -.0004 inches while an ABEC
7 is .0000 inches to -.0002 inches. Take note, this is not related to
internal radial clearance, it is only the production tolerance band.
The relevant question is whether a higher ABEC rating (and higher cost)
equate to lower traction torque (what you feel when you blade) and the
short answer is no.
For low nominal diameter (bore inner diameter, mm x RPM) bearings,
less than 100,000 nominal diameter, the manufacturing tolerance does
not have a significant impact. The ABEC rating becomes more important
at high nominal diameter (around 1 million) where dynamic considerations
(like ball excursion) come into play. For comparison, a inline skater
doing around 12 mph on 80MM outer diameter wheels would be at 10,000
nominal diameter. This is essentially a static load case. The other
case where a high ABEC rating is important would be for bearings used
in high precision instruments where the bearings would add tolerance
stack that degrades instrument precision.
The other choice to make is whether to buy the conventional steel bearings
(the most common) or go to the extra expense of a hybrid ceramic. A
typical bearing, for inline skates, will be made out of 52100 steel
( a high carbon steel) which is quite adequate. A hybrid ceramic has
Silicone Nitride balls on a steel inner and outer race. Hybrids have
far superior characteristics at higher speeds (> 1.5 million nominal
diameter) than steel bearings. The reasons are that SiN is lighter than
steel so the centrifugal loads (and hence contact stress) is lower resulting
in a longer fatigue life. SiN has a lower thermal expansion coefficient
so IRC does not reduce as much, reducing the thermal pre-load effect.
As an added bonus SiN is impervious to corrosion and appears to be more
damage tolerant. It is possible that hybrid ceramics may provide a marginal
benefit in a skate application, in spite of the 50% to 300% cost increase.
The marketing literature claims that hybrids require less lubrication.
Test experience done by Fred Ahrens PE, with hybrid ceramics (for missile
engine applications) does not support this assertion. It is likely that
this claim is based on the fact that since hybrids can run at higher
temperatures (lower thermal expansion) that it is simply more forgiving
of lubrication deprivation. This would not be noticeable to an inline
skater.
In conclusion, for aggressive and hockey players, an ABEC 1 is more
than sufficient. Also, the quality levels on all the reputable brands
is at ABEC 3 or better in any case (even if marked ABEC 1). For a casual
fitness inline skater (20 minutes typical session) an ABEC 3 or 5 will
do. For the hardcore fitness types (>1 hrs per trip) an ABEC 5 or
hybrid would be suitable. The primary drivers for traction torque will
be the internal geometry like race/ball finish, ball diameter to race
curvature, number of rolling elements, etc. These are not controlled
by the ABEC rating.
